EU Patent Reform: Prof. Tilmann, the old Roman god Janus and the requirements of Article 118(1) TFEU,

Article on recent developments in relation to Spain’s actions against the “unitary patent” Regulations at the European Court of Justice (Published on 22/05/2014)


Contents:

While the preparations for implementing the “unitary patent package” are advancing, intensive efforts are made to convince the users of the new system. However, risks remain. Apart from numerous European patents being opted-out of the new system, problems could also be caused by the Spanish nullity actions against the Regulations on the “unitary patent” and the respective language regime which are pending at the European Court of Justice. At the beginning of 2014, Prof. Winfried Tilmann, one of the forerunners of the “unitary patent” system, has commented on these actions in a very unusual manner. This statement, which, as it seems, has at least been supported by the German Federal Ministry of Justice, and the view he presented on the requirements of the legal basis for the “unitary patent” Regulation, Article 118(1) TFEU, will be the subject of this article.

  • Download English version (article of 22/05/2014, redacted version of 25/09/2014, PDF)
  • Download German version (article of 22/05/2014, redacted version of 25/09/2014, PDF)


Sources used:

  • Link to the article “When unity creates division: A Kat patent recap” on the IPKat blog.
  • Excerpts from the e-mail correspondence with the German Federal Ministry of Justice and Prof. Tilmann re his article in EIPR 2014, 4 ff. (English [translation] or German [original], PDF).
  • Letter from Hogan Lovells of 12/04/2012 to the European Scrutiny Committee of the UK House of Commons (via IPKat Blog).
  • Link to the article Stjerna, “The European Patent Reform – The sub-sub-suboptimal compromise of the EU Parliament” (PDF).
  • Link to the article Stjerna, “The European Patent Reform – Law-making in camera” (PDF).
  • Link to the article Stjerna, “The European Patent Reform – Failed for Now” (PDF).
  • Excerpts from the e-mail correspondence with the German Federal Ministry of Justice and Prof. Tilmann re his work as an advisor (English [translation] or German [original], PDF).
  • Link to the video recording of the Legal Affairs Committee meeting on 05/11/2013.
  • Verbatim protocol of the Legal Affairs Committee meeting on 05/11/2013 (English version, PDF).
  • Verbatim protocol of the Legal Affairs Committee meeting on 05/11/2013 (German version, PDF).
  • Verbatim protocol of the Legal Affairs Committee meeting on 05/11/2013 (Original languages, PDF).
  • Article of Prof. Winfried Tilmann, “The Battle about Articles 6–8 of the Union-Patent-Regulation”:
    • Link to the article (English).
    • Link to the European Scrutiny Committee Report “The Unified Patent Court: Help Or Hindrance? Vol. II” (English, PDF).
  • Link to the video recording of the Legal Affairs Committee meeting on 11/10/2012.
  • Link to the video recording of the Legal Affairs Committee meeting on 26/11/2012.
  • Audio recording of the meeting on 19/11/2012 (speeches in their respective original language, mp3, 19.8 MB).
  • The Parliamentary History of the European “Unitary Patent”, Verbatim protocol of the public meetings in the European Parliament and its Legal Affairs Committee (German/original language and English/original language).
  • Link to document SJ-0462/12, Legal Opinion by the Legal Service of the EU Parliament on the deletion of Art. 6 to 8 (PDF).
  • Link to the article Stjerna, “The European Patent Reform – New problems ahead?“ (PDF).
  • Comment by Wouter Pors (Bird & Bird, The Hague) on the IPKat Blog on 27/05/2014 (Scroll to the bottom of the page).


Further material:

  • Link to the post Stjerna, “The European Patent Reform – The »forgotten« documents of the Preparatory Committee of the Unified Patent Court”.
  • Link to Stjerna, Official information obtained under the German Federal Freedom of Information Act.
  • Link to Stjerna, The Parliamentary History of the European “Unitary Patent” (Tredition 2016), the foreword can be viewed here.


If you wish to support my work, you can do so here. Many thanks!